Applications must align with one or more of the following 24 emerging priorities in the U Research strategic plan. Please designate a primary focus area and up to two secondary focus areas:

 Emerging Health Areas:

• Genomics & Gene Therapy
• Bioeconomy
• Child Health
• Women’s Health
• Mental & Behavioral Health
• Medical Engineering
• Digital Health
• Rural & Remote

Emerging Technology Areas:

• Aerospace & Space
• Energy
• Wireless & Telecom
• Supply Chain
• Cybersecurity
• Robotics & Drones
• AI & Quantum
• Advanced Manufacturing

Emerging Society Areas:

• Food & Diet
• Community
• Disasters
• Engaged Arts
• Families
• Water & Air
• Global Citizenship
• Dialogue & Dispute

Career and tenure-line faculty members who hold at least a .50 FTE appointment are eligible to apply. Adjunct faculty are not eligible for the FFA program. Applicants must not have any outstanding final reports on previously funded projects managed by the Office of the Senior Vice President for Research and must be prepared to dedicate enough time to complete the proposed project during the requested semester of leave.

The FFA program accepts applications once per year. The FFA application process is two steps:

1. Step One: Faculty submit their applications via InfoReady on or before the first Thursday of October.
   • Step One Deadline: 11:59pm (MST) on Thursday, October 1^st, 2026
2. Step Two: Colleges submit their top 10 applications (with a ranking letter) on or before the last Thursday in October.
   • Step Two Deadline: 11:59pm (MST) on Thursday, October 29^th, 2026

The application process functions as follows:

1. Application Submission: Applicants will submit their full application via InfoReady.
2. College Review: Program Administrators will provide college deans and/or associate deans for research with all applications from their college. College leadership is expected to review and approve up to 10 applications (no more than 5 from a single department) to receive URC review. The top 10 applications should be ranked in priority order by college leadership in the form of a letter. The process for reviewing the applications will differ by college. Some colleges have all applications reviewed and ranked by an internal committee whereas others seek evaluations from department/unit heads. Colleges are free to select the process that is appropriate to their decision making. The result of this internal process informs the College Leadership ranking and can be used as a rationale in the accompanying letter. Note: only the applications and the college leadership ranking/letter are forwarded to the URC.
3. URC Review: The University Research Committee (URC) will review all applications approved by colleges and make funding recommendations to U Research Leadership. Members of the URC will not vote on applications from their own departments.
4. Awardee Notification: Awardees and their department chairs will be notified of award status. Both will be asked to finalize the award.

• Executive Abstract (one page maximum, PDF Format Only)
  The Executive Abstract should include project goals or research questions, plan of action or research methods, planned outcomes, and plan for dissemination. Abstract should also include up to 10 keywords that help identify the key objectives, disciplines, research/creative work types, and associated departments of the FFA proposal.
• Project Narrative (four page maximum, PDF Format Only)
  The Project Narrative must include:
  • Precise description of scholarly/creative work intended to be completed during release time.
  • Full action plan and/or research/creative approach
  • Plan for project dissemination
  • Estimated project timeline: Timelines should be as feasible and accurate as possible. Inflated timelines without clear milestones/deliverables will not be approved. We strongly encourage you to consider and plan for potential delays, setbacks, etc. when determining timeline. Timelines may not exceed 1 semester.
  • Impact of release time on the applicant (i.e., the impact FFA release will make on the applicant’s career). Junior faculty often position the application as key to promotion. Senior faculty often position the application as key to a new research program or intellectual transition.
• Abbreviated CV or Biographical sketch (five page maximum)
  Applicant must provide an updated and abbreviated CV or biographical sketch.

In general, FFA applications are evaluated on the criteria listed below by the University Research Committee (URC). The URC is a campus-wide faculty committee tasked with reviewing creative and scholarly research proposals and making funding recommendations to the SVPR. The URC may also comment on other strengths and weaknesses of the proposal overall. This is to ensure applications receive a thorough review of quality, merit, impact and feasibility.

FFA Proposals are evaluated on:

• The significance and soundness of the proposed research/creative work and timeline of project events/action.
• The impact of the release-time on advancing the applicant's career and/or personal research/creative mission. The URC has asked applicants to directly address this in their proposals.
• The impact of the proposed research/creative work on the Department's, College's, and University's research/creative missions.
• The likelihood that the project will bolster the University’s profile of research/creative excellence and support the U Research strategic plan

Acknowledgement Information: The recipient of any URC award is required to acknowledge the URC grant in any published results, catalogs, videos, or other products using the following URC Acknowledgment Statement: “This project was supported by the University Research Committee (URC) at the University of Utah. Its contents are solely the responsibility of the authors, and do not necessarily represent the official views of the URC, the Office of the Senior Vice President for Research, or the University of Utah.”

Research Misconduct: The SVPR Office has a zero-tolerance policy for research misconduct and unprofessional behavior in the research environment, i.e., harassment, bullying, discrimination, etc. Failure to comply with established policies on research misconduct and unprofessional behaviors in the research environment will lead to automatic termination of the awarded project AND automatic ineligibility for all future SVPR funding, program, and resources. Interaction with SVPR staff is considered the research environment and conduct toward SVPR staff before, during, or after the submission process is covered by this policy.

The recipient of any SVPR Internal Grant mechanism is required to submit a Final Report identifying a summary of the project, outcomes, next steps, etc. Final Report information will be shared in the award letter to selected applicants.

Final reports demonstrate impact and are essential for continuation of the program. Given that, colleges with outstanding reports will not be eligible for future funding.